Curb the street myths
Unbelievable! Support for three myths in just one phrase: “… the extra costs … (of complete-street requirements) … will fall exclusively on motorists until bicyclists and others pony up … .” (Dec. 29 editorial).
Myth No. 1: Motorists are a separate group of people from bicyclists and pedestrians, and the groups have no overlapping membership.
Myth No. 2: The cost of city streets is completely covered by motorist taxes, and none by sales taxes, property taxes, businesses and occupation taxes, and other sources of revenue. (Please use your considerable research resources to determine and report the percentages before going down this mythical road. Include all the taxes that help pay the costs of initial construction, periodic repair, maintenance, cleaning and policing of city streets.)
Myth No. 3: The decisions regarding city street construction should be for the benefit of those paying the taxes (pretending for the moment that Myth No. 2 is in fact true). When in our history did the will of the people become limited to those individuals who pay the taxes? Would you have the liquor taxes be allocated solely for the benefit of the liquor drinkers? And the tobacco tax spent only for the benefit of smokers?
Peter Duffy
Spokane gmorton on January 06 at 7:20 a.m. Mr Duffy is correct with respect to Myths #1 and #2. City streets have never been financed primarily with fuel and other taxes on motor vehicles. Nor should they be, since they serve many purposes and classes of users beyond auto drivers – pedestrians, bicyclists, transit vehicles, emergency vehicles, etc. “The decisions regarding city street construction should be for the benefit of those paying the taxes (pretending for the moment that Myth No. 2 is in fact true).” They should be for the benefit of the *users* of those streets, in proportion to the ratio of use. E.g., if auto traffic comprises 90% of daily travel on city streets, it should receive 90% of the ROW and 90% of the budget, and should receive priority over minor travel modes. In other words, you don’t sacrifice a traffic lane which carries 500 commuters per hour for as bike lane which carries 5.
Fuel Injector Cleaner Myths - News
Include all the taxes that help pay the costs of initial construction, periodic repair, maintenance, cleaning and policing of city streets.) Myth No. 3: The decisions regarding city street construction should be for the benefit of those paying the
Entitled “Debunking the 'Job Killer' Myth, How Pollution Limits Encourage Jobs in the Chesapeake Bay Region,” the report offers a counter-point to well-publicized criticism of the Bay TMDL and stringent EPA requirements, which, to date, have asserted
In response to my letter on global warming, a retired scientist stated that global warming has been proven to be a myth. He states that the major greenhouse gas is simply water vapor, that the Earth has gone through many periods of warming and cooling
Though natural gas burns cleaner than other fossil fuels, getting it out of the ground by fracking creates potent greenhouse gas emissions of methane. According to a congressional report released in April, the 14 biggest fracking companies released 3
One of the enduring myths about capitalism that continues to be perpetuated in mainstream economic textbooks and other pedagogic strategies is that labor supply is somehow exogenous to the economic system. The supply of labor is typically assumed,
